CLIENT — DEFENSE LOGISTICS COMMAND, NATO MEMBER TIMELINE 2021—2024 STATUS — IN OPERATION CLASSIFIED ANNEXES
12,000
ASSETS MODELED, PER-ASSET
92%
FORECAST PRECISION, 90 DAYS OUT
−38%
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME
−22%
PARTS INVENTORY HELD
01 / PROBLEM

READINESS AS A QUARTERLY GUESS

Fleet readiness was compiled by hand four times a year and was stale before it was briefed. Maintenance was reactive, spares were hoarded against uncertainty, and planners padded every deployment window because nobody could say which assets would actually be available.

02 / APPROACH

SURVIVAL MODELS IN THE PLANNER'S OWN TOOLS

We fused telemetry with thirty years of maintenance records and built survival models per asset class. Forecasts are not a dashboard to visit — they are written directly into the planning systems officers already use, on infrastructure accredited for classified networks.

TELEMETRY + 30 YEARS OF MAINTENANCE RECORDS, FUSED
FORECASTS DELIVERED INSIDE EXISTING PLANNING SYSTEMS
ACCREDITED FOR CLASSIFIED NETWORKS, 2023
03 / OUTCOME

PLANNING ON FORECAST, NOT FEAR

Unplanned downtime fell 38% and parts inventory 22%, while readiness itself rose — the forecast is trusted at 90 days with 92% precision. Deployment planning now runs on predicted availability rather than padded assumptions. Details beyond this page sit in classified annexes.

NEXT CASE / 01 GRID CONTROL, REBUILT LIVE